OVERALL AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY INDEX LEVELS OF REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 12-6-11
Integrity levels of Republican presidential candidates have sufficiently stabilized to make a meaningful evaluation and ranking of them worthwhile, as shown in the following table. Ron Paul presents the most complex situation as his personal integrity is FAR higher than his overall integrity level, which includes defeating Obama.
The integrity of Paul's outstanding plan to Restore America, as shown in the charts below the table, exceeds the ability of his personality to sell it to most voters. Even worse, the media is of NO help, as it places NO emphasis or significance on integrity, of any kind.
But more and more voters are seeing the wisdom in Paul's solutions to America's economic and integrity problems--and he and the Tea Party are setting the much better political agenda, as a result.
AMERICA DESPERATELY NEEDS A RON PAUL PRESIDENCY, BUT HE WOULDN'T WIN
ANY OF THE OVERALL TOP 3 CANDIDATES WOULD MOST LIKELY BEAT OBAMA AND PERFORM WELL AS PRESIDENT. THE TOP TWO WOULD TAKE CONTROL OF THE SENATE AS WELL. OVERALL INTEGRITY RANK CANDIDATE OVERALL INTEGRITY INDEX LEVEL, INCLUDING PERFORMANCE AS PRESIDENT AND ABILITY TO DEFEAT OBAMA, ON SCALE OF 0 TO 1,000 TOPS. CANDIDATE'S PERSONAL INTEGRITY INDEX LEVEL, ON SCALE OF 0 TO 1,000 TOPS OTHER INTEGRITY INDEX LEVEL RANK 1 Newt Gingrich 560 505 2 2 Mitt Romney 530 150 6 3 Herman Cain 305 420 3 4 Ron Paul 270 650 1 5 Rick Perry 250 50 8 6 Jon Huntsman 50 420 4 7 Michele Bachmann 40 160 5 8 Rick Santorum 6 100 7 SIGNIFICANT INTEGRITY STARTS AT LEVEL 300. ANYONE CLAIMING TO HAVE BETTER NUMBERS IS ASKED TO PROVIDE THEM
RON PAUL'S HIGH INTEGRITY PLAN TO RESTORE AMERICA
The following charts from Ron Paul, clearly show his plan to "Restore America". His numbers clearly show exactly what he is talking about. Paul well knows that to move the country from Point A to Point B--where as a minimum it needs to be, the country must be aimed at Point C, well beyond Point B. The charts generally show Points C, for that reason--in Iowalive's view.




