IOWA RANKS 28th IN PRESIDENT ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY

10-24-16

Greetings, Iowa Secretary of State & Election Commissioner, Paul Pate, Cedar Rapids Gazette Editorial Board and all—

Please forward this post to Iowa State Association of County Auditors – ISACA and all county auditors.  Thank you.

Herein are election process Integrity Index Scores as promised in Iowalive’s 10-21-16 http://www.iowalive.net/iowaelectionintegrity.htm post.  In addition, it is Iowalive’s response to the two following Gazette pieces and Secretary Pate’s claim “Iowa has got one of the cleanest , best election systems in the country…..”.   

Rod Boshart’s 10-18-16, 700 word  article headlined Pate dismisses Trump's 'rigged' election claim”—Average Integrity Index Score 100.  Pate claimed,  'Iowa has got one of the cleanest, best election systems in the country, and I guarantee every eligible Iowa voter will be able to cast their ballot for the Nov. 8 election,' said Pate, a former Cedar Rapids mayor.  Pate did not claim ineligibles were prevented from voting!

The 419 word Gazette 10-20-16 editorial headlined Don't fall for hype about 'rigged' election”—Average Integrity Index Score 105. The editors actually used the “integrity” word in the editorial’s last sentence!  “The integrity of the election process is not in question.”  And the editors cited 6 criminal convictions of  voter fraud.  That’s at least a start in cleaning up Iowa’s election process!

Integrity Index Scores in red in the following tables show where auditors and poll watchers should look more closely for voter fraud.  The first table is in rank order and the second is in alphabetical order, for reader convenience. 

SOLID DEMOCRATIC STATES: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington state.  12 of 16 of these states have evil Integrity Index Scores in red in the tables. 

STATES LEANING DEMOCRATIC: Colorado, Michigan, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin.  4 of 6 of these states have evil Integrity Index Scores in red in the tables. 

TOSS-UP STATES : Florida, Iowa, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio.  5 of 5 of these states have evil Integrity Index Scores in red in the tables. 

ONLY 14 STATES HAVE SIGNIFICANT ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY SCORES

ONLY 3 ARE SOLID DEMOCRATIC STATES

31 STATES HAVE EVIL 2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX SCORES.    THAT IS WHERE TO LOOK CLOSELY FOR VOTER FRAUD.  Source:  Iowalive  10-24-16

INTEGRITY RANK

STATE

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 10-24-16

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 11-11-16

1

Montana

410

TO BE DETERMINED AND RELEASED AFTER THE NOV. 8 ELECTION.

2

Wyoming

407

3

Maine

370

4

Washington

352

5

Utah

331

6

North Dakota

327

7

Vermont

327

8

Nebraska

316

9

Idaho

310

10

New Hampshire

310

11

South Carolina

308

12

South Dakota

307

13

New Mexico

306

14

Texas

306

15

Oklahoma

276

16

Arizona

270

17

Indiana

270

18

Wisconsin

267

19

Georgia

255

20

Colorado

240

21

Alaska

220

22

Missouri

216

23

Kansas

210

24

Ohio

207

25

New Jersey

202

26

Mississippi

180

27

Hawaii

170

28

Iowa

170

29

Nevada

114

30

Pennsylvania

110

31

Louisiana

107

32

Alabama

105

33

Arkansas

105

34

California

99

35

Connecticut

97

36

Delaware

92

37

Kentucky

77

38

Massachusetts

65

39

Florida

45

40

Minnesota

45

41

Tennessee

41

42

Michigan

35

43

Oregon

35

44

Maryland

25

45

Virginia

21

46

North Carolina

18

47

Illinois

15

48

New York

6

49

West Virginia

6

50

Rhode Island

3

 

Population Weighted Average

120

Integrity is Adherence to Moral and Ethics Principles.  The Antonym of Integrity is Evil

Integrity Index Score Derivation Methods are Posted on Website: http://www.iowalive.net/integrityderivation.htm

*Average on  a scale of 0 to 1,000 tops, where significant integrity starts at 300, evil is at 250 and below.  Grand larceny scores 40.

Anyone Claiming to Have Better Numbers is Asked to Provide Them, Along With Derivation Methods Used.

It would cost at least $5.5 million to have capable investigators prepare this table.

 

STATES ARE LISTED IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER

31 STATES HAVE EVIL 2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX SCORES.    THAT IS WHERE TO LOOK CLOSELY FOR VOTER FRAUD.  Source:  Iowalive  10-24-16

INTEGRITY RANK

STATE

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 10-24-16

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 11-11-16

32

Alabama

105

TO BE DETERMINED AND RELEASED AFTER THE NOV. 8 ELECTION.

21

Alaska

220

16

Arizona

270

33

Arkansas

105

34

California

99

20

Colorado

240

35

Connecticut

97

36

Delaware

92

39

Florida

45

19

Georgia

255

27

Hawaii

170

9

Idaho

310

47

Illinois

15

17

Indiana

270

28

Iowa

170

23

Kansas

210

37

Kentucky

77

31

Louisiana

107

3

Maine

370

44

Maryland

25

38

Massachusetts

65

42

Michigan

35

40

Minnesota

45

26

Mississippi

180

22

Missouri

216

1

Montana

410

8

Nebraska

316

29

Nevada

114

10

New Hampshire

310

25

New Jersey

202

13

New Mexico

306

48

New York

6

46

North Carolina

18

6

North Dakota

327

24

Ohio

207

15

Oklahoma

276

43

Oregon

35

30

Pennsylvania

110

50

Rhode Island

3

11

South Carolina

308

12

South Dakota

307

41

Tennessee

41

14

Texas

306

5

Utah

331

7

Vermont

327

45

Virginia

21

4

Washington

352

49

West Virginia

6

18

Wisconsin

267

2

Wyoming

407

 

Population Weighted Average

120

Integrity is Adherence to Moral and Ethics Principles.  The Antonym of Integrity is Evil

Integrity Index Score Derivation Methods are Posted on Website: http://www.iowalive.net/integrityderivation.htm

*Average on  a scale of 0 to 1,000 tops, where significant integrity starts at 300, evil is at 250 and below.  Grand larceny scores 40.

Anyone Claiming to Have Better Numbers is Asked to Provide Them, Along With Derivation Methods Used.

It would cost at least $5.5 million to have capable investigators prepare this table.

 

Website http://www.iowalive.net/electionintegrity2014.htm provides integrity scores for the 2014 election.  Pottawatomie county has substantially improved!!

http://www.iowalive.net/iowaelectionintegrity.htm

Sincerely,

Iowalive  A growing network of volunteer citizens and professionals for improving Iowa