COUNTY RANKING OF IOWA ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY

10-21-16

Greetings, Iowa Secretary of State & Election Commissioner, Paul Pate, Cedar Rapids Gazette Editorial Board and all—

 Please forward this post to Iowa State Association of County Auditors – ISACA and all county auditors.  Thank you.

Herein are election process Integrity Index Scores as promised in Iowalive’s 10-20-16 http://www.iowalive.net/trumpnodeal.htm  post.  In addition, it is Iowalive’s response to the two following Gazette pieces:   

Rod Boshart’s 10-18-16, 700 word  article headlined Pate dismisses Trump's 'rigged' election claim”—Average Integrity Index Score 100.  Pate claimed,  'Iowa has got one of the cleanest, best election systems in the country, and I guarantee every eligible Iowa voter will be able to cast their ballot for the Nov. 8 election,' said Pate, a former Cedar Rapids mayor.  Pate did not claim ineligibles were prevented from voting!

419 word Gazette 10-20-16 editorial headlined Don't fall for hype about 'rigged' election”—Average Integrity Index Score 105. The editors actually used the “integrity” word in the editorial’s last sentence!  “The integrity of the election process is not in question.”  And the editors cited 6 criminal convictions of  voter fraud.  That’s at least a start in cleaning up Iowa’s election process!

Integrity Index Scores in red in the following tables show where Paul Pate, county auditors and poll watchers should look more closely for voter fraud.  The first table is in rank order and the second is in alphabetical order, for reader convenience.   

64 IOWA COUNTIES HAVE SIGNIFICANT ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY SCORES

33 IOWA COUNTIES HAVE EVIL 2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX SCORES.    THAT IS WHERE TO LOOK CLOSELY FOR VOTER FRAUD.  Source:  Iowalive  10-21-16

INTEGRITY RANK

IOWA COUNTY

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 10-21-16

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 11-11-16

1

Kossuth

540

TO BE DETERMINED AND RELEASED AFTER THE NOV. 8 ELECTION.

2

Guthrie

530

3

Jackson

520

4

Mahaska

520

5

Lucas

517

6

Clayton

515

7

Emmet

515

8

Fremont

515

9

Hancock

513

10

Louisa

513

11

Floyd

510

12

Delaware

509

13

Humboldt

509

14

Page

509

15

Plymouth

509

16

Fayette

508

17

Greene

508

18

Ida

508

19

Monona

508

20

Montgomery

508

21

Winneshiek

507

22

Clarke

505

23

Crawford

505

24

Jefferson

505

25

O'Brien

505

26

Harrison

503

27

Pottawattamie

503

28

Henry

502

29

Clay

500

30

Dallas

500

31

Jones

500

32

Pocahontas

485

33

Keokuk

460

34

Mills

460

35

Allamakee

455

36

Ringgold

440

37

Chickasaw

430

38

Cherokee

425

39

Taylor

425

40

Marion

422

41

Scott

422

42

Decatur

420

43

Lyon

417

44

Mitchell

411

45

Appanoose

410

46

Cedar

410

47

Cerro Gordo

410

48

Tama

406

49

Worth

405

50

Warren

402

51

Buena Vista

400

52

Union

400

53

Benton

380

54

Webster

370

55

Boone

365

56

Adair

325

57

Shelby

317

58

Carroll

315

59

Howard

315

60

Jasper

315

61

Buchanan

310

62

Franklin

310

63

Adams

305

64

Des Moines

305

65

Audubon

295

66

Lee

255

67

Clinton

210

68

Bremer

205

69

Davis

205

70

Osceola

205

71

Wapello

205

72

Butler

170

73

Sac

165

74

Marshall

155

75

Black Hawk

150

76

Van Buren

124

77

Linn

120

78

Muscatine

120

79

Calhoun

115

80

Cass

115

81

Monroe

115

82

Grundy

110

83

Hamilton

110

84

Hardin

110

85

Poweshiek

110

86

Sioux

108

87

Wayne

108

88

Story

106

89

Washington

106

90

Dickinson

105

91

Iowa

105

92

Madison

105

93

Winnebago

105

94

Woodbury

105

95

Palo Alto

101

96

Dubuque

100

97

Wright

100

98

Johnson

30

99

Polk

3

 

Population Weighted Avg.

170

 

Integrity is Adherence to Moral and Ethics Principles.  The Antonym of Integrity is Evil

Integrity Index Score Derivation Methods are Posted on Website: http://www.iowalive.net/integrityderivation.htm

*Average on  a scale of 0 to 1,000 tops, where significant integrity starts at 300, evil is at 250 and below.  Grand larceny scores 40.

Anyone Claiming to Have Better Numbers is Asked to Provide Them, Along With Derivation Methods Used.

It would cost at least $1.5 million to have capable investigators prepare this table.

 

COUNTIES ARE LISTED IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER

33 IOWA COUNTIES HAVE EVIL 2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX SCORES.    THAT IS WHERE TO LOOK CLOSELY FOR VOTER FRAUD.  Source:  Iowalive  10-21-16

INTEGRITY RANK

IOWA COUNTY

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 10-21-16

2016 VOTER REGISTRATION & ELECTION PROCESS INTEGRITY INDEX *SCORE TO DATE 11-11-16

56

Adair

325

TO BE DETERMINED AND RELEASED AFTER THE NOV. 8 ELECTION.

63

Adams

305

35

Allamakee

455

45

Appanoose

410

65

Audubon

295

53

Benton

380

75

Black Hawk

150

55

Boone

365

68

Bremer

205

61

Buchanan

310

51

Buena Vista

400

72

Butler

170

79

Calhoun

115

58

Carroll

315

80

Cass

115

46

Cedar

410

47

Cerro Gordo

410

38

Cherokee

425

37

Chickasaw

430

22

Clarke

505

29

Clay

500

6

Clayton

515

67

Clinton

210

23

Crawford

505

30

Dallas

500

69

Davis

205

42

Decatur

420

12

Delaware

509

64

Des Moines

305

90

Dickinson

105

96

Dubuque

100

7

Emmet

515

16

Fayette

508

11

Floyd

510

62

Franklin

310

8

Fremont

515

17

Greene

508

82

Grundy

110

2

Guthrie

530

83

Hamilton

110

9

Hancock

513

84

Hardin

110

26

Harrison

503

28

Henry

502

59

Howard

315

13

Humboldt

509

18

Ida

508

91

Iowa

105

3

Jackson

520

60

Jasper

315

24

Jefferson

505

98

Johnson

30

31

Jones

500

33

Keokuk

460

1

Kossuth

540

66

Lee

255

77

Linn

120

10

Louisa

513

5

Lucas

517

43

Lyon

417

92

Madison

105

4

Mahaska

520

40

Marion

422

74

Marshall

155

34

Mills

460

44

Mitchell

411

19

Monona

508

81

Monroe

115

20

Montgomery

508

78

Muscatine

120

25

O'Brien

505

70

Osceola

205

14

Page

509

95

Palo Alto

101

15

Plymouth

509

32

Pocahontas

485

99

Polk

3

27

Pottawattamie

503

85

Poweshiek

110

36

Ringgold

440

73

Sac

165

41

Scott

422

57

Shelby

317

86

Sioux

108

88

Story

106

48

Tama

406

39

Taylor

425

52

Union

400

76

Van Buren

124

71

Wapello

205

50

Warren

402

89

Washington

106

87

Wayne

108

54

Webster

370

93

Winnebago

105

21

Winneshiek

507

94

Woodbury

105

49

Worth

405

97

Wright

100

 

Population Weighted Average

170

 

Integrity is Adherence to Moral and Ethics Principles.  The Antonym of Integrity is Evil

Integrity Index Score Derivation Methods are Posted on Website: http://www.iowalive.net/integrityderivation.htm

*Average on  a scale of 0 to 1,000 tops, where significant integrity starts at 300, evil is at 250 and below.  Grand larceny scores 40.

Anyone Claiming to Have Better Numbers is Asked to Provide Them, Along With Derivation Methods Used.

It would cost at least $1.5 million to have capable investigators prepare this table.

 

 Website http://www.iowalive.net/electionintegrity2014.htm provides integrity scores for the 2014 election.  Pottawatomie county substantially improved!!

Sincerely,

Iowalive  A growing network of volunteer citizens and professionals for improving Iowa